Outreachy report: July 2025
Focal points
Program activities
- We started our cohort with 26 interns, but one intern failed their midpoint evaluation. We have one intern with a 3-week extension. We received another extension request in this batch of midpoint evaluations.
- We closed our first cycle of community listening sessions about cuts to program activities. We welcomed 3 to 4 different mentoring communities in each synchronous session, and received comments from 10+ mentoring communities through other platforms (Zulip, email).
Open Mentorship Handbook
- I was elected to serve a two-year term (2025-2027) at the Diversity & Inclusion in Scientific Computing (DISC) Committee.
- I have dedicated my time to exploring and determining what should be the most fundamental project boundaries and choices.
Description of activities
I’m delighted to announce that we were awarded an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grant to build and disseminate my Open Mentorship Handbook project. Additionally, I’m elated to announce that I was elected to serve a two-year term (2025-2027) at the Diversity & Inclusion in Scientific Computing (DISC) Committee with a platform to help existing DISC projects and keep developing the Open Mentorship Handbook with the support of NumFOCUS. Such achievement firmly establishes the Open Mentorship Handbook as a multi-stakeholder initiative.
The first public engagement around the Open Mentorship Handbook project took place at DISC Unconference 2025 back in March. I was blessed with the enthusiasm and participation of several leaders of projects sponsored by NumFOCUS. My goal is to reactivate and direct that incredible energy to the writing and editing of the product we envisioned together at DISC Unconference, and to ultimately disseminate it among NumFOCUS communities.
NumFOCUS has been extremely supportive of the Open Mentorship Handbook since it was first proposed in February. We’ve exchanged several messages brainstorming prospect funding sources, and we had a meeting in early July to discuss the similarities and the differences between the Open Mentorship Handbook project and more established projects such as the DISCOVER Cookbook.
The DISCOVER Cookbook has two ongoing internal projects of interest being developed under Google Summer of Code:
- The creation of a versioning system. The DISCOVER Cookbook has adopted a documentation as code approach for its editorial process. A docs as code strategy entails the adoption of the same practices and workflow as software development teams (e.g. usage of issue trackers, version control systems, code reviews). The DISCOVER Cookbook is created with Sphinx and published on GitHub Pages. This project seeks to leverage some of the continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD) features of GitHub such as GitHub Actions workflows.
- The addition of a localization system. The DISCOVER Cookbook has reached a point of maturity where editors feel confident in adding internationalization and localization processes. This project aims to establish a translation workflow for the DISCOVER Cookbook.
Both projects are representative of strategic and operational questions project leaders must answer for initiatives of this nature:
- Means of publication: Where and how will the contents of the handbook be published? What editorial approach will be adopted? Are the contents expected to be static (i.e. representative of a perspective at a point in time), dynamic (i.e. continuously evolving), or mixed (i.e. continuously evolving, but with established markers for specific “complete” versions)?
- Means of collaboration: Where and how will internal and external collaborators draft and review the contents of the handbook?
- Means of governance: Who is responsible for reviewing and approving changes? Who controls the publication and collaboration platforms?
- Means of evaluation: What criteria should be used to evaluate the state of maturity of the initiative? When will it be ready for more complex processes such as internationalization and localization? What does it mean for an external community to effectively adopt some or all practices of the handbook?
The documentation of the practices and the philosophy behind Outreachy as a mentorship program is one of the most fundamental aspects of this project. As you may know, we’ve been raising our concern about a significant decrease in funding for core program activities for almost a year. Unfortunately, despite our team’s herculean efforts to find more funding sources, our financial position hasn’t changed.
At its core, the Open Mentorship Handbook is a labor of love: it’s an initiative to disseminate the expertise our team has acquired running Outreachy for over 15 years. It’s a constructive way to cope with an existential threat: we’re striving for consolidating and transforming our lived experiences into perennial open practices. A gift to the open communities that have stood with us for so many years, open communities we have yet to know, and open communities that are yet to exist.
The other side of the coin are the impending cuts to program activities. After much consideration, we’ve decided to phase out a significant portion of our community engagement activities. We’re discontinuing our bi-weekly blog prompts, internship assignments for mentors and interns, and intern chats. We’re continuing to streamline internship evaluation cycles and invest our time in efforts to reduce the necessity of synchronous orientation of mentors and interns. We’re considering making public initial, midpoint and final reports including a description of activities and a list of artifacts created during the internship mandatory for interns.
As for progress of the June 2025 cohort, we currently have 25 active internships. 12 interns have passed their midpoint evaluation, and 11 interns are currently being evaluated. Unfortunately, one intern failed their midpoint evaluation, which resulted in an internship termination. We have one extended internship and one extension request under discussion and consideration.
Upcoming activities
My mission for the month of August is to answer most, if not all strategic and operational questions about the Open Mentorship Handbook listed above. My most immediate tasks:
- Finish delineating our timeline, backlog, metrics and milestones;
- Present and approve a project plan between August 7th and August 14th;
- Procure and establish the technical infrastructure for collaboration and publication;
- Procure open mentorship resources from communities that have operated or currently operate under Outreachy.
My goal for the next two months is to widen the scope of our references, resources and interactions as key project elements become well-defined. As for program operations, my most immediate tasks are:
- Coordinate code changes impacting the following processes and/or workflows:
- Mentoring community sign up;
- Mentorship project submission;
- Initial application submission;
- Initial application review;
- Intern selection approval.
- Support community engagement initiatives:
- Call for mentoring communities;
- Call for applicants.
- Coordinate intern evaluations:
- Authorize second stipend payments for interns with successful evaluations;
- Design interventions for concerning evaluations;
- Monitor extended internships.